Actually, I think it's quite a shame...
The Imagine Cup is for students, therefore it is meant to be educational, isn't it...
But all you hear from it when the results show up is "too bad, better luck next time"...
I can understand it between round 1 and round 2 as there are a lot of submissions...
But what about between round 2 and 3? "Only" 150 games, and they are all deeply reviewed, aren't they... The jury could at least put one little explanation, or the notation, to explain why the game didn't make it, whereas some others did...
I know all students think the same, and even more for those who already lived the "you didn't make it to the finals, byebye", and didn't even know if they were 7th or 150th...